Hi, what are you looking for?
Las Vegas hotel will pay for EEOC disability discrimination lawsuit
Disability discrimination leads to EEOC lawsuit for this brewery
Restaurant worker fired for not sharing their tips
Sex discrimination case showcases pain of ignoring harassment
Why you’ll receive a list of colleague names & ages if you’re laid off
Study: How do we feel about paying for our social media?
Meet Chatwise, the social media app that gives its creators equity
Reddit user? Here’s a Tweetdeck-esque browser app for you
Meta Oversight Board calls for less ambiguous nudity guidelines
Loophole allowed anyone to bypass Facebook 2FA, Meta confirms
Author Kris Berg argues pros & cons of Dual Agency in answer to Greg Swans editorial: The Dual Agency Smack Down
Here is an Excerpt:
“Greg Swann is a well-known critic of dual agency transactions.I will offer one example of how this statement is not only wrong but offensive…”
After HUD announced changes to FHA short sales policies, they quickly recanted and postponed a ban on dual agency.
The real estate consuming public wants results. In the last half century they've simply not made even a small deal out of dual agency.
Real estate and sharing The Internet has made it easy for everyone to share. Which seems to be a problem when it comes to...
Back in the day… Back in the day, when interest rates were 18%, and the MLS consisted of a huge 3-ring binder, agents and...
Barry Preusz
October 18, 2008 at 5:34 pm
Isn’t “dual agency” an oxymoron? How can one represent the best interests of two parties on opposite ends of a contract. If an agent is acting on behalf of their client they cannot serve the best interest of other party to the contract as well. One can argue that it is in the best interest of both sides for the transaction to be completed and that dual agency seeks to attain this end. However, this does not appear to fall under the description of “agency” but instead “mediation”. Dual agency is really mediation and not agency at all!
Barry Preusz