<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MLS 5.0 &#8211; Peeling The Onion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agentgenius.com/g-rants-insanity-more/real-estate/mls-50-peeling-the-onion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agentgenius.com/g-rants-insanity-more/real-estate/mls-50-peeling-the-onion/</link>
	<description>News About Real Estate Social Media, Marketing, Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:54:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Transformation in the Air &#171; OnBlog: The Onboard Informatics Blog</title>
		<link>http://agentgenius.com/g-rants-insanity-more/real-estate/mls-50-peeling-the-onion/#comment-17734</link>
		<dc:creator>Transformation in the Air &#171; OnBlog: The Onboard Informatics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=3601#comment-17734</guid>
		<description>[...] vision of MLS 5.0, the interesting phenomenon is that the responses &#8212; almost all of which are negative, some even downright hostile &#8212; do not take issue with the basic concept itself. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vision of MLS 5.0, the interesting phenomenon is that the responses &#8212; almost all of which are negative, some even downright hostile &#8212; do not take issue with the basic concept itself. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://agentgenius.com/g-rants-insanity-more/real-estate/mls-50-peeling-the-onion/#comment-16475</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=3601#comment-16475</guid>
		<description>@Michael - you asked the right question. How will it be monetized?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael &#8211; you asked the right question. How will it be monetized?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sosnowski</title>
		<link>http://agentgenius.com/g-rants-insanity-more/real-estate/mls-50-peeling-the-onion/#comment-16423</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sosnowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=3601#comment-16423</guid>
		<description>I like to think of myself as a technology person, but that does not mean that everything new is essentially good and an improvement of current practices.  Sometimes taking a &quot;questioning&quot; view is seen as &quot;living in the past&quot;.

There are many comments here about the useless of Trulia and Zillow and I agree with those comments - these companies COMPETE directly with individual agents who have local website - yet we are foolish enough to continue sending them listings.  How stupid is that?

Realtor.com is also a competitor, and using PPC in local markets to find position and clients online.  What is to stop a national MLS from doing yet the same thing.  As it is now, we even have to compete against our local MLS board for space online.

Yet there will always be those who insist that consolidation is the way to go.  In most cases they are the one with little or no web presence in their local markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to think of myself as a technology person, but that does not mean that everything new is essentially good and an improvement of current practices.  Sometimes taking a &#8220;questioning&#8221; view is seen as &#8220;living in the past&#8221;.</p>
<p>There are many comments here about the useless of Trulia and Zillow and I agree with those comments &#8211; these companies COMPETE directly with individual agents who have local website &#8211; yet we are foolish enough to continue sending them listings.  How stupid is that?</p>
<p>Realtor.com is also a competitor, and using PPC in local markets to find position and clients online.  What is to stop a national MLS from doing yet the same thing.  As it is now, we even have to compete against our local MLS board for space online.</p>
<p>Yet there will always be those who insist that consolidation is the way to go.  In most cases they are the one with little or no web presence in their local markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benn Rosales</title>
		<link>http://agentgenius.com/g-rants-insanity-more/real-estate/mls-50-peeling-the-onion/#comment-16421</link>
		<dc:creator>Benn Rosales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=3601#comment-16421</guid>
		<description>Playing the DA here...

Saul says that his ES says nothing about NAR control, so in that vein, who would operate it if not NAR? Would it be the same 50, or are we talking something newer and bigger for R.C to completely fly into the side of a mountain? More questions than answers seems to be the rule here because as per usual real engagement isn&#039;t taking place.

Come on Saul, we know you&#039;re reading- close the deal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playing the DA here&#8230;</p>
<p>Saul says that his ES says nothing about NAR control, so in that vein, who would operate it if not NAR? Would it be the same 50, or are we talking something newer and bigger for R.C to completely fly into the side of a mountain? More questions than answers seems to be the rule here because as per usual real engagement isn&#8217;t taking place.</p>
<p>Come on Saul, we know you&#8217;re reading- close the deal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Rathbun</title>
		<link>http://agentgenius.com/g-rants-insanity-more/real-estate/mls-50-peeling-the-onion/#comment-16420</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rathbun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=3601#comment-16420</guid>
		<description>D,

OK, with just the example of Foster and Weichert I get your meaning better.  Sorry, I needed it in a local context.  I agree that numbers do yield power....

So, in essence your saying franchises have a great influence than brokerages - got it.  I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D,</p>
<p>OK, with just the example of Foster and Weichert I get your meaning better.  Sorry, I needed it in a local context.  I agree that numbers do yield power&#8230;.</p>
<p>So, in essence your saying franchises have a great influence than brokerages &#8211; got it.  I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Duncan</title>
		<link>http://agentgenius.com/g-rants-insanity-more/real-estate/mls-50-peeling-the-onion/#comment-16411</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=3601#comment-16411</guid>
		<description>Regarding the API&#039;s - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zillowblog.com/opening-up-the-zillow-api-to-allow-sites-in-the-api-network-to-access-homes-for-sale/2008/08/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;look no further than what Zillow is doing&lt;/a&gt; - they&#039;re doing everything they can to win the hearts and minds of the consumers (and thereby &lt;em&gt;force&lt;/em&gt; Realtors to accept them).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the API&#8217;s &#8211; <a href="http://www.zillowblog.com/opening-up-the-zillow-api-to-allow-sites-in-the-api-network-to-access-homes-for-sale/2008/08/" rel="nofollow">look no further than what Zillow is doing</a> &#8211; they&#8217;re doing everything they can to win the hearts and minds of the consumers (and thereby <em>force</em> Realtors to accept them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obeoman</title>
		<link>http://agentgenius.com/g-rants-insanity-more/real-estate/mls-50-peeling-the-onion/#comment-16409</link>
		<dc:creator>Obeoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=3601#comment-16409</guid>
		<description>Missy, Jim, all-

SOMEONE is still going to make money at the MLS.

Might it be less? Yes. What industry has not had to deal with the web economy.

Fewer employees? Yes (...see above parens...)

More info, faster - and for free? Yes. The consumer demands it.

And hats off to the Wisconsin Realtors Associaton  beginning to unite MLSs with the WIREX project.

Steve
Obeoman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missy, Jim, all-</p>
<p>SOMEONE is still going to make money at the MLS.</p>
<p>Might it be less? Yes. What industry has not had to deal with the web economy.</p>
<p>Fewer employees? Yes (&#8230;see above parens&#8230;)</p>
<p>More info, faster &#8211; and for free? Yes. The consumer demands it.</p>
<p>And hats off to the Wisconsin Realtors Associaton  beginning to unite MLSs with the WIREX project.</p>
<p>Steve<br />
Obeoman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
