Shailesh Ghimire

Writer for national real estate opinion column AgentGenius.com, focusing on the improvement of the real estate industry by educating peers about technology, real estate legislation, ethics, practices and brokerage with the end result being that consumers have a better experience.

Email the author

Did you like this?

17 responses to “Social Media is Just Getting Started”

  1. Vicki Moore

    I just signed up. I wish I knew how to answer the questions so that I’ll be considered. It was like going to a job interview the very first time and not quite knowing what to say.

  2. Chris Shouse

    I signed up too but my blog is so new I have no data. Hope they choose me though that would be fun to have on your blog:)

  3. Trace

    Interestingly enough, Facebook has just banned Google FriendConnect…. they are citing privacy reasons and there is also the fact that they launched their own version called Facebook Connect a few days ago….so while the move is towards openness and communication among and between networks …. at the end of the day there are still business models that don’t see eye to eye…

  4. Carson

    I love it. Pulling the conversation into the frontier, rather than inside the fences. I’m not sure how facebook will fare, many have already signed their lives over to Google accounts. Their stuff is just so cool. FB may lose it’s luster anyway, and it can’t/wont be the only one left standing.

    Social media is about fun and meaningful connections, but most of all it’s about bragging (and spying). “This is who I know and this is what I’ve discovered”

    I like to spread what I find online, but do I share it in my reader, twitter it, stumble it? All 3? I want to converge this effort, because as of now, it’s a little chore. Open Social seems to be the perfect tool.

    But then again I would like to separate my personal life from my business life… Am I destined to share my relationships and my music interest with my boss, clients, or vendors? … Should I even worry about it?

    I’m not necessarily convinced that this is going to change the world or anything, but it will for people who like to aggregate and spread information… which isn’t everyone.

  5. Andy Kaufman

    Carson- “I like to spread what I find online, but do I share it in my reader, twitter it, stumble it? All 3? I want to converge this effort, because as of now, it’s a little chore.”

    http://friendfeed.com/ is doing an excellent job of aggregating these activities, I’d definitely recommend checking it out.

  6. Kevin Boer

    Looks like a very promising tool. From a strict business point of view (channeling Jeff Brown here) I can see some immediate benefits in terms of referrals:

    a) Jon (a past client of mine) and Betty are friends. Betty comes across my site from a Google search and see that Jon is a registered member. Presto! Instant credibility for me.
    b) Betty joins my site and leaves a comment for Jon: “Can’t believe you didn’t tell me about this guy earlier! We’re thinking of buying!” That comment ends up in her feed over at Facebook … or at least theoretically, once Facebook and Google figure out how to cooperate…

  7. Jayson

    Great article. Friend Connect seems like a nice addition for many websites. We’re certainly only in the beginning of what social networking will eventually become – IMO.

    Trace has a good point – businesses may not openly allow the exchange of information, especially when it’s a fight for market share and revenue.

  8. Brad Coy

    > Andy

    http://friendfeed.com/ is doing an excellent job of aggregating these activities, I’d definitely recommend checking it out.

    Me too on the recommend. That’s the first thing I though of when I read this. It’s very simple and effective. Let’s see if it catches on.

    Great find on the Friend Connect Shailesh. Looking forward to seeing how this works to bring things together.

  9. Morgan

    the problem with friend connect is:

    1. the site using it doesn’t own the data – google does – so you’re essentially channeling users to Google so they can leverage their data for their advertisers (not ideal)

    2. you don’t have detailed access to the information to leverage for your business. you can have community you just can’t know much about them which makes it difficult to leverage the benefits of said community on your site.

    that said, with friend connect being banned by facebook look for google to find ways to open up the data transparency so that they aren’t so greedy (or is it evil?)

  10. Jim Duncan

    The parallels between the MLS/listing aggregator debate and the FriendConnect/Facebook/etc. debate are stunning.

    It’s not just social media and it’s not just MLS data – it’s information and how who is going to control it.

  11. Veronique

    That’s really cool. I guess the more important thing here is that google is continuing to grow, not just trying to be a one or two trick pony. While I do thing social media and networks will continue to grow, I don’t think we’ll see another myspace or facebook for a while. A lot of people might say twitter is going to be the next myspace, but it seems like much more of a novelty site given its limited content. Maybe that’s what draws so many people, but I’m more interested in how big companies, like google in this story, is trying to grow and expand its reach.

    Great post.

  12. Shailesh Ghimire

    Morgan – good points. For a site like mine though who owns the date isn’t important necessarily. I want to connect with people who may be interested in doing business with me. Hence, if I can be introduced or referred to via an on site social network then I can take it a step further towards a close. At PQ time I’ll collect the data I need and it will be mine.

    Trace – it’s interesting that Facebook is not giving Google access – I guess there is a turf war going on there.

    Carson – I’m with yo on that – I don’t know if I want to have all my worlds interconnected. Kind of like George Costanza problem.

  13. Jim

    BrightKite is another “invitation only” social network site and appears to be turning into an elitist group. I’ve tried for weeks to get in, no response from them. I’m not sure who determines who “is good enough” to get into some of these groups, but it smacks of bigotry to me.

    BrightKite Not for Everyone

  14. Chris Shouse

    Jim I have three invites to brightkite send me your email and I will send you one:)
    Chris

  15. Chris Shouse

    Oh sorry my email is Chris@ChrisShouse.com

  16. Jay Thompson

    Jim –

    With all due respect, BrightKite is still in Beta. I’m not sure that it’s fair to label them as bigots. Using an “invitation only” system is pretty common during a beta-only phase of roll out.

    Google’s Gmail began as invitation only. It’s a way for a new company/service to control the volume of users in the beginning. Otherwise they would likely be flooded with requests, their servers overwhelmed and then people would start writing about how much they suck — killing the network/project before if ever got off the ground or gained any traction.

    Sorry that you haven’t gotten a response from them for weeks. I suspect tens of thousands haven’t either. Not that that makes it right, but I can understand why they are starting off as invite only.

    I just sent you an invite to BrightKite.

  17. Jim

    “I’m not sure that it’s fair to label them as bigots.”

    I didn’t. Read my post. I said it SMACKS OF bigotry. In other words, it gives the impression of that. Bad image to give out, IMO. I have recieved an invite from someone else, but thanks anyway.

    “Invitation only” roll outs make sense, if you handle them right. I don’t think these people did. No response for weeks is ridiculous. Anyway, I’ll play along with them for now. But I’m not impressed. Support is slow and spotty too. Nice design, but interface is confusing. I suspect we’ll see if they get their act together or self-distruct soon enough.

Social Reactions

    Leave a Reply

    TOP ↑